Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41904554›Full record

ArticleArchives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique2026

Exploring the perspectives of professionals involved in refugee and asylum seekers' reception and integration on access and utilization of healthcare: a qualitative study.

Ana Pinto de Oliveira, Regina Loesch, Cláudia Conceição, Inês Fronteira

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ana Pinto de OliveiraFaculty of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University of Algarve, Campus de Gambelas, Faro, Portugal. acoliveira@ualg.pt.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9599-0929
Regina LoeschGlobal Health and Tropical Medicine, GHTM, LA-REAL, Instituto de Higiene e Medicina Tropical, IHMT, Universidade NOVA de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal.
Cláudia ConceiçãoGlobal Health and Tropical Medicine, GHTM, LA-REAL, Instituto de Higiene e Medicina Tropical, IHMT, Universidade NOVA de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal.
Inês FronteiraNOVA National School of Public Health, Public Health Research Centre, Comprehensive Health Research Center, CHRC, REAL, CCAL, NOVA University Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn recent years, the number of displaced persons due to conflict, persecution, and environmental crises has significantly increased, leading to a large influx of refugees and asylum seekers in European countries, including Portugal. While the Portuguese National Health Service guarantees universal access to healthcare, numerous barriers still hinder the effective access and use of health services by refugee populations, particularly for the prevention and management of non-communicable diseases. This qualitative study aimed to explore the perspectives of professionals involved in refugee reception and integration regarding barriers to accessing and utilizing healthcare, with a particular focus on non-communicable diseases.

methodsA qualitative study informed by phenomenological principles was conducted. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with individual participants from December 2022 to March 2023, transcribed verbatim, and analysed using reflexive thematic analysis, informed by phenomenological principles.

resultsThirteen professionals from healthcare, reception, and integration sectors participated. Participants described a high burden of non-communicable diseases, particularly mental health conditions, alongside common risk factors such as unhealthy diets, sedentary lifestyles, and psychosocial distress. Barriers to healthcare access included cultural and linguistic challenges, bureaucratic complexity, and socioeconomic constraints. Facilitators - though less mentioned - included the involvement of cultural mediators, flexible service delivery, and intersectoral collaboration. Both refugees and professionals were described as adopting informal strategies to navigate systemic barriers.

conclusionThis study provides insight into how professionals perceive refugees and asylum seekers’ health needs and their access to healthcare in Portugal. Findings highlight the interplay of structural, linguistic, cultural, and socioeconomic factors shaping healthcare utilisation, informing the development of more equitable and culturally responsive health strategies.

Indexed as

Asylum seekersHealthcare accessNon-communicable diseasesPortugalQualitative researchReception and integrationRefugees

Identifiers

PMID41904554
PMCPMC13151075

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.