ArticleBMC medical education2026
Socioeconomic background, exam performance, and probability of medical school application among all MCAT examinees, 2017 to 2019.
Article in BMC medical education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe Medical College Admissions Test (MCAT) remains a significant barrier for students from low socioeconomic status (SES) backgrounds, with performance disparities driven by unequal access to resources rather than by differences in aptitude. Holistic admissions practices seek to contextualize exam performance alongside other essential pre-medical competencies such as resilience, empathy, and scientific inquiry. Evidence shows that students with middle-tercile MCAT scores who demonstrate these qualities will succeed in medical school and beyond. However, only those who apply can benefit from such holistic review. Little is known about application behaviors at this pivotal stage, when examinees must decide whether to apply with their achieved MCAT score. This study examines the relationship between socioeconomic status, MCAT performance, and application probability.
methodsThis study analyzed de-identified Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC) data for all MCAT examinees between 2017 and 2019, including sociodemographic characteristics and total MCAT score. The outcome was allopathic (M.D.) medical school application status through the 2021 application cycle, allowing examinees at least two full years to apply. The AAMC parental education and occupation (EO) indicator stood as a proxy for SES – ranging from EO-1 (less than college degree, any occupation) to EO-5 (doctoral degree; executive, managerial or professional occupations). Socioeconomic disadvantage (SED) was defined as EO-1 and EO-2.
resultsMiddle- or top-tercile MCAT scores were achieved by 51.8% of examinees with SED (middle, 33.2%; top, 18.6%) compared with 73.1% of examines without SED (middle, 34.4%; top, 38.7%). The probability of applying to medical school was closely tied to MCAT performance, and regardless of SES, the probability of application with any given MCAT score was similar. While most top-tercile performers (92 to 94%) applied, a much lower proportion of middle-tercile performers (78 to 80%) applied.
conclusionsSocioeconomically disadvantaged MCAT examinees infrequently score in the top tercile where application rates are uniformly high. Those with acceptable, middle-tercile performance may under-appreciate their academic achievements through economic adversity, as over 20% do not apply to medical school. Targeted interventions are needed to promote application and maximize the impact of holistic review.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.