ArticleBMC medical education2026
Exploring cultural safety and person- and patient-centred care in general practice: voices of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples.
Article in BMC medical education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples in Australia continue to experience significant health disparities rooted in the ongoing impacts of colonisation, systemic racism, and cultural disconnection. While patient-centred care (PCC) is widely promoted as a gold standard for high quality and respectful healthcare, its application to meet the unique needs of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander patients in general practice remains poorly understood. Instead, cultural safety has been offered as a contextually grounded approach to care, one that critically examines power imbalances, cultural identity, and the historical forces shaping healthcare experiences.
objectiveTo examine the alignment between Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples’ perspectives on interacting with general practitioners (GPs) and the principles of PCC and culturally safe care.
methodsA mixed method-approach was employed, beginning with a survey and followed by qualitative interviews that underwent thematic analysis. Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander adults with experiences of general practice care were invited to participate.
resultsSeventy Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people participated. Findings highlight the centrality of a trusting and caring relationships, effective communication, respect for diverse Indigenous identities, individualised care, clinical competence and the GP’s attitude. Key enablers of culturally safe care included adequate time, continuity of care, genuine engagement, informed consent, confidentiality, privacy, and a physically welcoming environment.
conclusionOur study found significant diversity in participant perspectives, reinforcing that a ‘one-size fits all’ approach is inappropriate. The principles of PCC support culturally safe care through adaptability and respect for patient values.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.