ReviewBMC gastroenterology2026
Life-threatening lower gastrointestinal bleeding after routine anorectal procedures: a case series and management implications.
Review in BMC gastroenterology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThis case series characterizes enema- and catheter-induced rectal injuries as an underrecognized iatrogenic cause of life-threatening lower gastrointestinal bleeding (LGIB). By focusing on elderly, high-risk patients, we highlight the diagnostic complexities and management strategies associated with these routine yet potentially catastrophic anorectal procedures.
methodsWe analyzed three cases of high-risk elderly patients who experienced acute, massive hemorrhage following routine anorectal procedures, specifically glycerin enemas and anorectal manometry. To contextualize these findings, we performed a narrative literature review of the PubMed and Web of Science databases to identify recurring clinical characteristics and predisposing factors associated with these iatrogenic rectal injuries.
resultsAll three elderly patients with significant comorbidities experienced sudden, painless, massive hematochezia following routine anorectal procedures. Standard anoscopy failed to localize the bleeding source due to obscuration by extensive blood clots. However, emergency colonoscopy without bowel preparation successfully identified and treated bleeding foci in the distal rectum (3-4 cm from the anal verge). Clinically, the patients demonstrated profound hemoglobin drops ranging from 10 to 80 g/L (nadir: 59 g/L) and severe hemodynamic instability (lowest blood pressure [BP]: 89/56 mmHg; Heart rate[HR]: 120 bpm). Two patients required massive blood transfusions, receiving up to 13 units of red blood cells and 1,350 mL of fresh frozen plasma to maintain stability. Notably, all three patients required Intensive care unit (ICU) admission for intensive monitoring and resuscitation. Common risk factors identified included advanced age, prolonged bed rest, and underlying coagulopathy.
conclusionIn frail, bedridden patients, even routine anorectal procedures such as enema administration or catheterization can trigger catastrophic, life-threatening hemorrhage. While instrumentation is the primary trigger, clinical outcomes depend on recognizing potential mucosal vulnerability. The key to survival lies in early risk stratification, maintaining a high index of clinical suspicion regarding recent procedural history, and proceeding directly to emergency colonoscopy to identify and treat hidden bleeding sources in the distal rectum. Such vigilance is not merely best practice-it is life-saving and should be formally integrated into clinical guidelines to enhance safety for high-risk populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.