Observational studyBMC primary care2026
Active practice charter accreditation is associated with higher quality outcomes in English general practice: a cross-sectional observational study.
Observational study in BMC primary care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe Active Practice Charter (APC), introduced by the Royal College of General Practitioners (RCGP), aims to embed physical activity (PA) promotion within primary care, theoretically enhancing both patient health and practice quality. However, the effectiveness of this voluntary accreditation and its social equity implications remain under-researched. This study aims to assess the independent relationship between APC accreditation and three quality outcomes (Quality and Outcomes Framework (QOF) score, patient satisfaction rate and Care Quality Commission (CQC) rating) while exploring whether this relationship varied across the socioeconomic deprivation spectrum. This is the first large-scale empirical assessment of the APC.
methodsThis cross-sectional observational study analysed data from 6,063 General Practice (GP) practices in England (523 APC-accredited). Initial non-parametric bivariate tests showed APC practices tended to have larger list sizes, were located in less socioeconomically deprived areas, and served a greater proportion of older adults than non-APC practices. Multivariable regression (Ordinary Least Squares and Ordinal Logistic) was used to assess the main effect of APC status, controlling for size, socioeconomic deprivation, and patient demographics. Equity implications were explored through moderation analysis and stratification analysis across ten deciles of the Index of Multiple Deprivation (IMD).
resultsWhen compared with non-APC practices, APC practices had statistically significantly lower IMD scores, higher proportions of older adults and a higher proportion of White ethnicity. This implies some socioeconomic inequities in the take-up of the APC programme across England. In our main effects model, APC accreditation had a statistically significant and robust positive association with patient satisfaction (β = 1.979, p < 0.001) and CQC ratings (OR = 1.321, p < 0.001), and only a small but significant association with QOF points (β = 0.893, p < 0.01). Moderation analysis suggested uniform effects across the socioeconomic deprivation spectrum, although followup stratification analysis revealed some evidence of social inequity, with the positive effects on patient satisfaction being concentrated in the mid-range of socioeconomic deprivation.
conclusionsAPC accreditation is associated with higher levels of patient experience and regulatory success, strengthening the case for its promotion. There was evidence of socioeconomic patterning in APC uptake, but no statistically significant global interaction in outcomes by deprivation. Future policy should focus on providing dedicated resources and tailored support to overcome resource constraints in socioeconomically deprived settings to ensure the APC does not inadvertently widen existing quality gaps.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.