Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41904395›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2026

A comparative analysis of topological domain callers over RNA-associated interactome.

Tuna Alaygut, Emre Sefer

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Tuna AlaygutArtificial Intelligence and Data Engineering Department, Ozyegin University, Orman Sokak, Cekmekoy, 34794, Istanbul, Türkiye.
Emre SeferArtificial Intelligence and Data Engineering Department, Ozyegin University, Orman Sokak, Cekmekoy, 34794, Istanbul, Türkiye. emre.sefer@ozyegin.edu.tr.

Funding

Türkiye Bilimsel ve Teknolojik Ara?t?rma Kurumu 122E706
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTopological domains (TADs) are consecutive genomic locations with denser local interactions to a certain extent, and they are important for cellular gene expression control and modulation. TADs were first identified when studying three-dimensional genomic structures over Hi-C interaction datasets. Many studies have focused on developing approaches in inferring TADs, which led to multiple TAD-caller approaches development. On the other hand, the number of RNA interactome datasets, such as RNA-RNA and RNA-DNA interactions, has recently been increasing. Even though TADs have been extensively studied in Hi-C datasets, they have not been studied across these RNA interactomes.

resultWe conducted a systematized comparison of 28 TAD-callers across mammalians over RNA-associated interactomes (RAIs), especially RNA-RNA and RNA-DNA interaction datasets at a high resolution. Our findings highlighted the significant enrichment of Cohesin/CTCF proteins at RNA-TAD boundaries for both RNA-RNA and RNA-DNA interactomes, especially those with corner dots, which are similar to the results for original TADs. The sizes and numbers of RNA-TADs vary significantly between different TAD caller approaches and RNA interactome resolution, suggesting the importance of considering RNA-TADs as hierarchical domains rather than distinct intervals.

conclusionWe examined the core principles and assumptions behind TAD-callers over RNA interactomes. To our best knowledge, this is the first time that many TAD inference methods are adapted to infer TAD-like domains on RNAs. Our results provide valuable guidance in selecting the most suitable methods for TAD inference over RNA interactomes.

Indexed as

Computational BiologyRNAAnimalsDNAGenomicsHumansDNARNARNA-Associated InteractionsRNA-DNA InteractomeRNA-RNA InteractomeTopological domains

Identifiers

PMID41904395
PMCPMC13170028

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.