ArticleThe Saudi dental journal2026
UV-spectrometric study of antibiotic long-term release by different osteoplastic materials used in dentistry.
Article in The Saudi dental journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Nowadays, the development and improvement of osteoplastic materials containing antibiotics as long-term controlled-release systems represent a promising direction in bioactive dental practice. To evaluate the relative capacity of different osteoplastic materials used in oral surgery and clinical dental practice to accumulate and subsequently release antibiotics after exposure to antibiotic solutions, using spectrometric analysis. 3 osteoplastic materials "Biomin GT" ("Rapid", Ukraine), "easy-graft CLASSIC 150" ("Regenity Biosciences", USA), and "InterOss" (1-2 mm) ("SigmaGraft", USA) were immersed in 4 antibiotic aqueous solutions (5.0% ofloxacin, 5.0% metronidazole, 4.0% gentamicin sulfate, and 5.0% chloramphenicol) during 24 h and dried later. UV-spectrometric studies were performed to quantify the release of antibiotics into sterile saline on the 2nd, 5th, 10th, and 30th day. Evaluated osteoplastic materials released different volumes of the antibiotics. Samples of osteoplastic materials (after prior immersion in antibiotic solutions) can serve as systems for long-term release of antibacterial substances (up to 30 days). However, the levels of accumulation and release differ across materials and active substances. The highest levels of antibiotic release (and accumulation, respectively) were observed for "Easy GRAFT" - 6.07 ± 5.84 (M = 3.49) mg per 1 g of osteoplastic material. Among the antibiotics, the highest rate was for gentamicin sulfate - 10.67 ± 3.57 (M = 8.67) mg per 1 g, whereas chloramphenicol showed 3.11 ± 0.48 (M = 3.01) mg per 1 g of material. The interaction between osteoplastic material and various antibiotics requires further clarification and verification at both the experimental and clinical levels. Release curves for the studied antibiotics from various osteoplastic materials were obtained over a one-month period. The ability of dental osteoplastic materials to accumulate antibiotics within their mass has been demonstrated.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.