ArticleNPJ digital medicine2026
A multicenter randomized clinical trial of portable transcranial alternating current stimulation for major depressive disorder.
Article in NPJ digital medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06891326 (Efficacy and Safety of Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation for Depression), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Efficacy and Safety of Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation for Depression: a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial Study
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
Abstract
High-definition transcranial alternating current stimulation (HD-tACS) is an emerging neuromodulatory intervention for major depressive disorder (MDD). Here, we evaluate the efficacy and safety of a portable, low-intensity (1.6 mA), 10 Hz HD-tACS protocol targeting the bilateral dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) in adults with MDD. This randomized clinical trial was conducted including 120 adult MDD participants. Participants underwent 20 sessions (5 sessions/week for 4 weeks) of either active 10 Hz HD-tACS (1.6 mA) or sham stimulation a ratio of 1:1 and were followed for an additional 4 weeks. The primary outcome was the percentage reduction in 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale scores at week 4. The active group showed significantly greater improvement in depression than the sham group (48% ± 14% vs 24% ± 13%, p < 0.001), sustained through the 4-week follow-up period. Additionally, significant improvements in the active group were also found in anxiety, sleep efficiency, quality of life components of physical, vitality, social functioning, and mental health. Adverse events including two cases of new-onset hypomania occurred, but no serious adverse events were observed. Thus, this trial supported the efficacy and good tolerability of 10 Hz HD-tACS for patients with MDD. Further research requires more focus on the underlying neural mechanisms and the optimized stimulation protocols. Trial Registration: China Clinical Trial Registry Identifier: ChiCTR2500103570. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT06891326.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.