ArticleMolecular psychiatry2026
Pallidal and subthalamic stimulations modulate inter-hemispheric interaction and asymmetry in Parkinson's disease.
Article in Molecular psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Substantial asymmetries of motor dysfunction are evident in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD), the mechanisms of which remain largely unexplored. This study investigated how deep brain stimulation (DBS) targeting the globus pallidus interna (GPi) and subthalamic nucleus (STN) modulates characteristics of hemispheric lateralization in PD patients, with particular emphasis on motor asymmetries and hemispheric integration (via homotopic functional connectivity) and segregation (via hemispheric asymmetry in connectivity). Resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) III scores were analyzed from 55 PD patients who underwent either bilateral GPi- or STN-DBS. Both targets produced significant improvements in motor function. Notably, stimulation effects on motor asymmetry depend on patients' baseline asymmetry direction (DBS OFF): STN-DBS consistently reduced asymmetry in the leftward-asymmetry patients, whereas GPi-DBS has stronger effects in rightward patients. In both cases, stimulation led to a more symmetric pattern. Beyond motor outcomes, motor gains were associated with changes in homotopic connectivity in the lateral occipital region, overlapping the extrastriate body area, suggesting a compensatory role of visual networks. These findings highlight the contribution of the visual networks to motor improvement and reveal target-dependent effects of DBS on both motor asymmetry and non-motor cognitive domains.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41904270What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.