Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41904257›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Comprehensive evaluation of the environmental performance and durability of biochar-incorporated concrete.

Seung-Beom Kang, Jin-Seok Woo, Minkyeong Pyo, Hyun-Do Yun, Wonchang Choi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Seung-Beom KangDepartment of Architectural Engineering, Gachon University, Seongnam-Si, 13120, Republic of Korea.
Jin-Seok WooDepartment of Architectural Engineering, Chungnam National University, Daejeon, 34134, Republic of Korea.
Minkyeong PyoDepartment of Chemical and Biological Engineering, Gachon University, Seongnam-Si, 13120, Republic of Korea.
Hyun-Do YunDepartment of Architectural Engineering, Chungnam National University, Daejeon, 34134, Republic of Korea. wiseroad@cnu.ac.kr.
Wonchang ChoiDepartment of Architectural Engineering, Gachon University, Seongnam-Si, 13120, Republic of Korea. wchoi@gachon.ac.kr.

Funding

National Research Foundation of Korea RS-2024-00408370
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To achieve global carbon neutrality, the construction industry is increasingly focused on reducing the carbon footprint of cement-based materials. However, comprehensive evaluations of biochar-incorporated concrete integrating long-term mechanical performance, freeze–thaw durability, and environmental impact remain limited. To address these issues, this study presents a comprehensive experimental evaluation of wood-based biochar as an alternative supplementary cementitious material (ASCM) in concrete. The physical characteristics of the biochar were analyzed using scanning electron microscopy (SEM), SEM–EDX, and Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) analyses, and the chemical characteristics were evaluated using XPS. Concrete performance was evaluated in terms of mechanical properties (compressive strength, flexural strength, and static modulus), freeze–thaw durability with quantitative image-based surface analysis, and a life cycle assessment (LCA) was performed to quantify global warming potential (GWP). The results indicate that concrete containing 5% biochar achieved the target design strength of 24 MPa, whereas 7% replacement resulted in a compressive strength reduction of up to 35.5% compared to the plain mix. After 300 freeze–thaw cycles, the 5% biochar mixture maintained a durability factor of 96.8% and reduced the increase in surface scaling and increase in void count by approximately 74 and 72%, respectively, compared with the plain specimen. LCA results revealed that increasing the biochar replacement ratio reduced GWP, with up to a 27.7% reduction at 7% replacement. Considering both mechanical performance and environmental impact, a biochar replacement range of 3–5% was identified as optimal. These findings demonstrate that wood-based biochar is a viable ASCM for sustainable and low-carbon concrete construction.

Indexed as

BiocharCompressive strengthEnvironmental impact assessmentFreeze–thaw

Identifiers

PMID41904257
PMCPMC13039177

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.