ArticleScientific reports2026
A hybrid machine learning approach for predicting the flexural strength of concrete reinforced with waste aluminium fibres.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The reutilization of industrial waste in concrete offers an effective pathway toward sustainable construction. In this study, waste aluminium fibres are investigated as an alternative reinforcement material, and a novel hybrid stacking ensemble model is developed to predict the flexural strength of aluminium fibre reinforced concrete. An experimental program evaluating aluminium fibre contents ranging from 1% to 5% identified an optimal dosage of 3% for flexural performance. A dataset comprising 195 samples, collected from experimental results and published studies, was used to train and test machine learning models. Random Forest (RF), Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), and Artificial Neural Network (ANN) models were optimized and combined within a stacking ensemble framework. The proposed hybrid model achieved superior predictive accuracy, with coefficients of determination (R2) of 0.9913 for training and 0.9627 for testing, outperforming the individual models. Explainability analysis using SHAP revealed that specimen age and aggregate content exert the greatest influence on flexural strength. These findings demonstrate that hybrid ensemble learning, coupled with explainable artificial intelligence, provides a reliable and interpretable approach for predicting the flexural behaviour of sustainable concrete incorporating waste aluminium fibres.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.