ArticleScientific reports2026
Investigation of microbiological non-compliance of endoscopic final rinse water associated with opportunistic premise plumbing pathogens contamination in connecting tube.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Non-compliant final rinse water (microbial culture results exceeding 10 cfu/100 mL) is an under-recognized risk factor for failure of flexible gastrointestinal (GI) endoscope reprocessing, since it is an important step following disinfection during the reprocessing of flexible endoscopes. Opportunistic premise plumbing pathogens (OPPPs) may colonize terminal segments of the water distribution system and compromise rinse water quality. This study investigated the cause of recurrent final rinse water non-compliance in a GI endoscopy unit and evaluated an engineering intervention to prevent it. During August 2024, samples were collected from 34 reprocessed flexible gastrointestinal endoscopes (102 post-reprocessing samples) and various points within the water delivery system, including purified water and final rinse water from automated endoscope reprocessors and manual washing tanks. All samples were subsequently cultured for microbial analysis. After contaminated connecting tubes were identified as a potential OPPPs reservoir, 10 tubes between the circulation loop and the reprocessing equipment were replaced, and surveillance cultures were repeated at the same sampling sites. Initial assessments revealed low compliance rates of 32 water samples (37.5%, 12/32), according to infection control standards (≤ 10 cfu/100 mL). Water samples collected before connecting tubes showed 100% compliance (12/12 samples). Water collected through connecting tubes and final rinse taps all showed 0% compliance (0/10 samples), except for the water sample from AER 6, which had a bacterial count of 75 cfu/100mL, all other samples contained too numerous bacteria and could not be counted. The dominant bacteria is Sphingomonas paucimobilis, which was found in 14 samples, with a composition ratio is 43.75% (14/32). Others are Methylobacterium oryzae (8/32, 25%), Chryseobacterium indologenes (6/32, 18.75%), and Herbaspirillum huttiense (2/32, 6.25%). After replacing the connecting tubes, the compliance rate of water samples developed significantly to 100% (32/32) (P = 6.9 × 10− 8). The primary reason for non-compliance of final rinse water is the contamination of connecting tube by the OPPPs. These findings emphasize the need for shortening the connecting tube length and thorough cleaning and disinfecting of connecting tube between circulating tube and endoscope reprocessor, which are generally neglected in routine maintenance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.