ArticleScientific reports2026
Daily associations of subjective and objective sleep parameters with restorative sleep and morning sleepiness in Japanese working adults.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Restorative sleep and morning sleepiness are essential factors associated with daytime functioning among workers, yet their variability and determinants remain unclear. Previous studies have primarily focused on either subjective or objective sleep measures, with many cross-sectional investigations, although fewer longitudinal studies have considered the interaction with psychological and chronobiological factors. The aim of this study was to investigate both subjective and objective sleep parameters, along with psychological and chronobiological factors, and examine their influence on daily restorative sleep and morning sleepiness in healthy workers. Thirty-seven participants wore portable sleep monitoring devices over multiple days and completed daily subjective sleep assessments. Using multilevel linear mixed-effects models, we examined associations between sleep parameters and next-morning outcomes. The results indicated that longer subjective and objective total sleep time were associated with greater restorative sleep, while longer subjective and objective sleep onset latency were negatively associated with restorative sleep. Regarding morning sleepiness, longer subjective and objective total sleep time, as well as a higher proportion of deep sleep, were associated with reduced morning sleepiness. In contrast, a greater severity of depressive symptoms was associated with increased morning sleepiness. These findings highlight the value of considering both subjective and objective sleep parameters when evaluating daily sleep outcomes. In occupational medicine, assessing workers' sleep using both subjective and objective measures, while also considering depressive symptoms, could be beneficial.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.