ArticleScientific reports2026
A comparative SWOT analysis of urban green infrastructure in the Global South.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Rapid urbanization, combined with climate change, may exacerbate urban environmental challenges, presenting risks such as flooding, health and safety issues, and environmental degradation. To meet these challenges, as well as other challenges associated with urban development, novel solutions are needed. While Green Infrastructure (GI) is increasingly implemented as a solution in many urban areas, its adoption remains limited in cities of the Global South, despite significant potential. Like most infrastructure, the objective of the design must meet the local needs, which can be highly variable for GI. Additionally, in the implementation of GI it is important to consider the feasibility of implementation, operations and management, and local environment for sustainable and impactful function of these systems. In addition to environmental feasibility, implementation requires financial investment, regulatory frameworks, and institutions to facilitate the adoption of GI. This study conducted a comparative SWOT assessment of GI interventions in three cities within the Global South (Dhaka, Bangladesh; Addis Ababa, Ethiopia; and Johannesburg, South Africa). The results of this study show how the needs, value, and drawbacks of implementing different types of GI vary based on the local context.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.