ArticleNPJ science of learning2026
Enhanced word learning and neural synchrony during children's storytelling.
Article in NPJ science of learning, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Children learn better through shared social experiences like storytelling, where they benefit as both listeners and tellers. Encouraging children to tell stories is a form of scaffolding, an instructional strategy in which learners and instructors are actively engaged. While the educational benefits of storytelling and scaffolding are well-documented, their underlying neural processes remain underexplored. Shared experiences are generally reflected in neural synchrony, which is often linked to comprehension. This study examined learning outcomes and neural synchrony in young school-aged children engaged in storytelling through either scaffolding or passive listening. Results showed that scaffolding improved learning outcomes and was associated with higher synchrony between teacher and young learner. However, these learning benefits disappeared in remote learning environments, highlighting the importance of face-to-face interaction for active learning strategies. Taken together, the heightened cortical synchrony between teacher and learner in face-to-face settings points to the benefits of active interaction as a learning strategy.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.