Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41904163›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Exerting effort for non-instrumental information under risk.

Haoxue Fan, Bryan J W Dong, Dorothy Grace Benkelman, Alexandra M Rodman, Hayley M Dorfman, Paul W Glimcher, Elizabeth A Phelps

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Haoxue FanDepartment of Psychology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3967-6457
Bryan J W DongDepartment of Psychology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Dorothy Grace BenkelmanDepartment of Psychology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Alexandra M RodmanDepartment of Psychology, Northeastern University, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4640-7159
Hayley M DorfmanDepartment of Psychology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9865-8158
Paul W GlimcherGrossman School of Medicine, New York University, New York, NY, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7872-3856
Elizabeth A PhelpsDepartment of Psychology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA. phelps@fas.harvard.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6215-8159

Funding

Stress, Arousal and Mood: Affective Influences on Decisions under UncertaintyR01DA042855 · NIDA · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY · PI PHELPS, ELIZABETH ANYA · 2017 to 2021
$2.6M
Behavioral and neurocognitive mechanisms linking peer victimization to adolescent psychopathologyR00MH126163 · NIMH · NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY · PI RODMAN, ALEXANDRA MAYORCA · 2023 to 2025
$747k
National Science Foundation SBE 2105147NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA042855NIMH NIH HHS R00 MH126163
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

People constantly invest effort to seek information in everyday life, even if the information is of no instrumental value for the decision at hand. However, the mechanism underlying people’s willingness to exert effort in exchange for information remains unclear. Previous work has suggested that desirability and uncertainty are two key factors influencing information-seeking, but few studies have tested if these factors are important when exerting physical effort in exchange for information. Additionally, it remains unknown whether different kinds of uncertainty, i.e., risk and ambiguity, have differential impacts. In the current study, we developed a novel information-seeking task to quantify the value of non-instrumental information using incentive-compatible physical effort to examine how effort changes as a function of desirability and uncertainty. Across two studies (N = 123), we found that people’s willingness to exert effort is positively associated with outcome expected value under both risk and ambiguity. Additionally, people exert more effort when outcome distribution uncertainty increases in risky situations, but are insensitive to ambiguity, except when facing extreme ambiguity. Our results demonstrate an unexpected dissociation. Humans will engage in effort-based information-seeking, even for non-instrumental information, when facing risk. In contrast, they show a much lower willingness to expend effort to resolve non-instrumental ambiguity.

Indexed as

AmbiguityEffortInformation-seekingRiskUncertainty

Identifiers

PMID41904163
PMCPMC13039730

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.