ArticleNature communications2026
Accumulation of virtual tokens towards a jackpot reward enhances performance and value encoding in dorsal anterior cingulate cortex.
Article in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Normatively, our decisions ought to be made relative to our total wealth, but in practice, we make our decisions relative to variable, decision-time-specific set points. This predilection introduces a major behavioral bias that is known as reference-point dependence in Prospect Theory, and it has close links to mental accounting. Here we examined neural activity in the dorsal anterior cingulate cortex (dACC) of macaques performing a token-based risky choice task, in which the acquisition of six tokens (accumulated over several trials) resulted in a jackpot reward. We found that subjects make faster and more accurate choices, and that they are less prone to risk-taking as offer contingencies are easier and the jackpot reward becomes more likely to be achieved. By comparing alternative models that accounted for progressive token accumulation, we found that subjective evaluations are best explained by a reference-dependent value 'RDV' model where offer values are considered as potential gains or losses with respect to a token-dependent reference. The reference-dependent model allows to implement a dynamical comparison of the two offered values to each other and to the number of missing tokens to reach the six-tokens threshold as jackpot approaches. In dACC, we find that gains in subjective values entail higher fractions of encoding cells than losses, and that the encoding tuning of expected utility variables is best aligned with upcoming choices in gains than in losses. These results suggest a neural basis of reference dependence biases in shaping decision-making behavior and highlight the critical role of value representations in dACC in driving evaluations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.