ArticleThe journal of nutrition, health & aging2026
Prospective study of breakfast frequency and timing and risk of myocardial infarction and coronary artery disease in community-dwelling older adults: The Cardiovascular Health Study.
Article in The journal of nutrition, health & aging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesBecause it is unknown whether breakfast frequency and timing are associated with long-term risk of incident myocardial infarction (MI) and coronary artery disease (CAD) among older adults, this study aimed to assess relationships between breakfast frequency/timing and MI/CAD risk among older adults and determine whether they depend on sex or cardiometabolic risk factors. DESIGN AND
settingProspective cohort study of older American adults. PARTICIPANTS AND MEASUREMENTS: Weekly breakfast frequency and usual daily breakfast time were assessed by questionnaire in 4070 adults aged ≥ 65 years from the Cardiovascular Health Study who were prospectively followed for up to 26 years. Cause-specific hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated from multivariable-adjusted Cox proportional hazards models.
resultsDuring follow-up, 1617 CAD cases were documented (795 MI cases). Although consuming breakfast 7 days/week (85.3%) and 'breaking-fast' between 07:00 and 09:00am (72.6%) were both associated with higher education and socioeconomic status, being married, not smoking, and consuming fruits and vegetables, neither breakfast frequency nor breakfast timing was associated with risk of CAD or MI in males, females, or altogether. In pre-specified analyses, compared with participants who ate breakfast daily, those who did not eat breakfast daily had an HR for MI of 0.66 (95% CI: 0.43, 1.02) if their body mass index (BMI) was ≥30 kg/m
conclusionBreakfast frequency and timing were not associated with either higher or lower risk of MI and CAD in these older adults. Although a priori stratification by cardiometabolic risk factors may have revealed potential trends, the findings must be confirmed in a larger study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.