ArticleNeuro-oncology2026
Expanding the molecular grading criteria in IDH-mutant astrocytoma.
Article in Neuro-oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- "Updates on diagnostic and prognostic molecular biomarkers of CNS tumors".Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2026Review
- Validation of proposed cIMPACT-NOW update 12 molecular grading criteria for IDH-mutant astrocytoma.Acta neuropathologica · 2026Article
- GAN-generated target reconstruction CT radiomics for prediction of the novel IASLC grading of pulmonary adenocarcinoma.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
29 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIDH-mutant astrocytomas are classified as WHO grade 4 in the presence of conventional high-grade histologic features and/or homozygous CDKN2A/B deletion in the 5th edition of the WHO Classification of Central Nervous System Tumour guidelines. However, work over the past decade has indicated a number of other molecular alterations that warrant consideration as potential prognostic markers.
methodsWe used univariate Kaplan-Meier and multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression analysis to evaluate the prognostic effects of homozygous CDKN2A/B deletion, CDK4 amplification, CCND2 amplification, PDGFRA amplification/mutation, PIK3R1 mutation, PIK3CA mutation, MYCN amplification, EGFR amplification/mutation, TERT promoter mutation, and grade 4 histologic features in two independent cohorts of WHO grade 2-4 IDH-mutant astrocytoma (n = 840 and n = 367).
resultsThe presence of CDK4 amplification, CCND2 amplification, PDGFRA alteration, PIK3R1 mutation, MYCN amplification, and EGFR alteration were each associated with reduced overall survival compared to WHO grade 2/3 astrocytomas without these molecular features. 17.7% (148/837) of otherwise grade 2/3 astrocytomas had one or more of these molecular criteria, with resulting intermediate clinical outcome in terms of overall survival (median survival of 67.3-82.0 months) compared to grade 2/3 astrocytomas without these molecular features (median survival of 135.0-140.7 months) and grade 4 astrocytomas (median survival of 35.3-45.0 months).
conclusionsThe presence of CDK4, CCND2, PDGFRA, PIK3R1, MYCN, and EGFR alterations result in an intermediate patient survival in IDH-mutant astrocytoma. Adding these molecular alterations should be considered in future diagnostic classification systems to improve stratification of high-risk patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.