ArticleThe international journal of cardiovascular imaging2026
A TMAD-based rapid assessment model for left ventricular systolic function in patients with coronary artery disease: a multicenter prospective development and validation study.
Article in The international journal of cardiovascular imaging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Assessing left ventricular (LV) systolic function is critical for diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis. Current methods like LV ejection fraction (LVEF) and global longitudinal strain (GLS) are time-consuming and image-quality-dependent. This study aimed to evaluate the prognostic value of Tissue Motion Annular Displacement (TMAD) in patients with CAD and develop a stable, reproducible LVEF estimation model for rapid cardiac dysfunction screening. In this prospective, multicentre study we characterised LVEF and TMAD, calculated AUROCs to predict MACE and reduced systolic function, and performed Cox modelling for MACE risk. A rapid LVEF evaluation method was developed using the best-fit model and applied in CAD patients. TMAD, especially nTMADmid, showed significant correlations with GLS (r = 0.850, P < 0.001) and LVEF (r = 0.608, P < 0.001). Moreover, TMAD demonstrated high diagnostic efficacy for identifying MACE (AUC = 0.880, P<0.001) and reduced LV systolic function (AUC = 0.903, P = 0.008). The multivariate Cox proportional hazards model revealed that TMAD was the only independent risk factor for MACE. Power equations (highest F-value) were selected to build the model, showing minimal bias between observed and estimated LVEF across validation sets. Furthermore, TMAD exhibited high intra- and inter-observer reproducibility, was independent of view selection and image quality, and required significantly shorter time-consuming than both LVEF and GLS. TMAD is a valuable tool for assessing LV systolic function and providing incremental prognostic information. The TMAD-based predictive model enables rapid LVEF prediction and rapid detection of myocardial damage. Its simplicity and independence from image quality make it particularly useful in challenging imaging scenarios.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41903104What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.