ReviewRheumatology and therapy2026
Efficacy/Effectiveness, Safety and Treatment Persistence of Filgotinib in Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Narrative Review of Clinical Trials and Real-World Evidence.
Review in Rheumatology and therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Filgotinib (FIL) is a Janus kinase preferential inhibitor, classified as a targeted synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (tsDMARD). It is approved for patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who have failed treatment with methotrexate (MTX), a conventional synthetic DMARD (csDMARD). Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating 100 and 200 mg doses of FIL + MTX have demonstrated rapid effects in reducing disease activity, pain, and fatigue and improving functional outcomes compared with MTX monotherapy or adalimumab (a biologic) + MTX. FIL's efficacy in reducing disease activity and improving functional outcomes was sustained in the long-term (3 years), while also minimizing radiographic progression. In particular, 200 mg FIL + MTX significantly reduced radiographic progression uncoupled from disease activity, outperforming adalimumab + MTX in patients with medium or high disease activity. Adverse events were similar among FIL, MTX, and adalimumab over 52 weeks in RCTs, with a consistent safety profile in the long term (> 8 years). FIL persistence rates were generally high, regardless of dose. Evidence from real-world observational studies complements and underscores the effectiveness and safety of FIL demonstrated in RCTs. These findings support FIL's potential as a therapeutic option in the management of RA. Guidelines currently recommend a starting dose of 200 mg FIL ± MTX; a 100 mg starting dose can be used if the patient is elderly (Europe); at increased risk of venous thromboembolism, major adverse cardiovascular events or malignancy (Europe); or has impaired renal function (Japan). Furthermore, patients should only initiate FIL after inadequate response to MTX or other csDMARDs. In clinical practice, there may be additional considerations that could impact outcomes, including persistence and variations in patient profiles and treatment backgrounds. Future results from ongoing studies can be expected to provide further insights into the long-term effectiveness, such as joint outcomes and safety of FIL, in the real-world context.Graphical abstract available for this article.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.