ReviewCurrent neurology and neuroscience reports2026
Preclinical Models of Traumatic Brain Injury: Advances in In Vitro Models.
Review in Current neurology and neuroscience reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of reviewIn vitro traumatic brain injury (TBI) models are invaluable tools for elucidating cellular injury mechanisms and enabling preclinical drug screening. This review discusses recent advances in two main areas: neural culture systems and mechanical injury models. RECENT
findingsThe adoption of human induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC)-derived neural cells in 3D cultures, including cerebral organoids and scaffold-based constructs, has substantially improved species and structural relevance of in vitro TBI models. However, future development of functional vascularization and mature synaptic circuitry remains necessary. Mechanical injury models, including stretch, compression, and blast, are well established. Tissue tolerance thresholds (i.e. tissue strain and strain rate) for injury outcomes (i.e. cell death and electrophysiological deficits) have been extensively characterized in rodent studies, but comparable benchmarks for human neural cultures are lacking. With the growing use of human iPSC-derived neural cells, a critical next step is to recalibrate established mechanical injury models for human neural cultures to define human-specific tolerance thresholds, thereby enabling more mechanistically grounded preclinical therapeutic testing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41903078What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.