Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41903059›Full record

ReviewCurrent heart failure reports2026

Implementation of Machine Learning in Heart Failure Trials.

Letizia Rosa Romano, Marta Scimeca Odorico, Antonio Curcio

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current heart failure reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Letizia Rosa RomanoDivision of Cardiology, Annunziata Hospital, 87100, Cosenza, Italy.
Marta Scimeca OdoricoDepartment of Pharmacy, Health and Nutritional Sciences, University of Calabria, Rende, 87036, Italy.
Antonio CurcioDivision of Cardiology, Annunziata Hospital, 87100, Cosenza, Italy. antonio.curcio.cardio@unical.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3213-4436

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewHeart failure (HF) is a heterogeneous syndrome that challenges the design and interpretation of results from clinical trials. This review examines how machine learning (ML) can address methodological constraints of traditional trial models, such as rigid eligibility criteria, fixed endpoints, and limited external validity. RECENT

findingsBy integrating multimodal data from electronic health records, imaging, biomarkers, and wearables, ML enhances patient stratification, refines inclusion criteria, and improves prediction of mortality, HF hospitalization, and treatment response. It also enables adaptive trial designs, continuous monitoring, and dynamic endpoint evaluation. Despite these advances, challenges related to bias, interpretability, and regulatory adaptation persist. ML complements rather than replacing conventional methodologies, and promotes more adaptive, inclusive, and patient-centered HF research. Responsible implementation—based on transparency, rigorous validation, and fairness—may redefine evidence generation and bridge clinical trials with real-world practice.

Indexed as

Clinical Trials as TopicHeart FailureMachine LearningHumansPredictive Learning ModelsClinical trialsHeart failureMachine learningRemote monitoringRisk prediction

Identifiers

PMID41903059
PMCPMC13032980

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.