ArticleRadiological physics and technology2026
Fast 3D whole-body occupational dose estimation in interventional radiology using physics-informed deep learning.
Article in Radiological physics and technology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Occupational radiation exposure in interventional radiology is spatially heterogeneous and inadequately captured by conventional point-based dosimetry. This study proposes a physics-informed deep learning framework for fast prediction of three-dimensional (3D) physician dose distributions from scattered radiation. Graphics processing unit (GPU)-accelerated Monte Carlo (MC) simulations were performed using the GPU Geant4-based Monte Carlo Simulation platform to generate 3D dose maps under varying X-ray energies, C-arm angulations, and physician configurations. These data were used to train residual and transformer-based 3D U-Net architectures. Model performance was evaluated using voxel-wise error metrics, gamma analysis, and clinically relevant personal dose equivalents. The residual 3D U-Net achieved the best performance, with mean absolute errors below 0.06 nGy and gamma passing rates exceeding 90%. Predicted personal dose equivalents showed close agreement with MC references, enabling anatomically resolved dose estimation for superficial and deep tissues. Average inference time was approximately 0.2 s per sample. This framework enables fast, accurate, and anatomically detailed estimation of occupational dose, addressing key limitations of conventional dosimetry. The results support its potential integration into real-time radiation awareness and guidance systems for improved operator radiation protection in interventional practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41903035What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.