Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41903031›Full record

ReviewCurrent HIV/AIDS reports2026

Ain't I A Woman: Bridging Womanist Theory and HIV Implementation Science.

Whitney C Irie, Juliet Iwelunmor

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current HIV/AIDS reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Whitney C IrieSchool of Social Work, Boston College, Chestnut Hill, MA, United States. irie@bc.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8228-7206
Juliet IwelunmorDivision of Infectious Diseases, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewThis paper explores how womanist theory. a framework grounded in the lived experiences, cultural knowledge, and spiritual traditions of Black women, can enhance HIV implementation science. We ask: How can womanist theory advance more equitable, effective, and culturally congruent HIV prevention, care, and treatment for Black women? RECENT

findingsBlack women account for 55% of new HIV diagnoses in the U.S. despite being only 13% of the female population. Traditional implementation strategies often fail to account for the structural racism, gendered stigma, and socio-spiritual factors that shape their experiences. Recent womanist-informed interventions have centered radical subjectivity, community, and spiritual wholeness to transform engagement, care, and healing. Womanist theory offers a vital and underutilized paradigm for designing HIV implementation strategies thatprioritize the wellness, agency, and leadership of Black women. By integrating womanist principles into studydesign, implementation processes, and evaluation, researchers and practitioners can develop more just andsustainable approaches to ending the HIV epidemic among Black women.

Indexed as

Black or African AmericanFeminismHIV InfectionsImplementation ScienceFemaleHumansSocial StigmaUnited StatesBlack women and HIVculturally congruent careHIV implementation scienceintersectionality and healthstructural determinants of healthwomanist theory

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.