ArticleMarine biotechnology (New York, N.Y.)2026
Dietary Probiotic and Enzyme Supplementation Enhances Growth Performance, Digestive Function, and Immune Response in Penaeus vannamei.
Article in Marine biotechnology (New York, N.Y.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study assesses the impact of probiotic and enzyme supplementation on the growth, health, digestive enzyme activity, immune response, and nutritional composition of Pacific white shrimp (Penaeus vannamei). As sustainable aquaculture practices become increasingly important, functional feed additives like probiotics and enzymes are considered viable alternatives to antibiotics. The experiment was conducted in controlled indoor conditions using a completely randomized design with four treatments: a control group, a probiotic-phytobiotic supplement (ADX), a multienzyme complex (ZZ), and a combination of both (ADX + ZZ). These additives were incorporated into commercial feed throughout the trial period. Results showed that ZZ and ADX + ZZ improved growth performance, and ADX + ZZ yielded the lowest feed conversion ratio. Digestive enzyme responses were additive-specific: ADX increased protease and amylase activities, whereas ZZ and ADX + ZZ increased lipase activity, with no clear change in cellulase. Survival did not differ among treatments, while immune indices varied, with higher total hemocyte counts in ZZ and higher Prophenoloxidase activity in ADX + ZZ. Whole-body proximate composition and amino acid profiles were improved in supplemented groups, with the highest total amino acids observed in ADX + ZZ. Water quality parameters remained within acceptable limits across all treatments, supporting the environmental compatibility of these additives. Overall, probiotic–enzyme strategies can enhance P. vannamei performance and feed utilization; further work should validate these effects at farm scale and examine long-term and microbiota-mediated responses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41903011What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.