ArticleBreast cancer research and treatment2026
Real-world treatment patterns and outcomes in older patients with metastatic breast cancer: a multi-institutional retrospective cohort study.
Article in Breast cancer research and treatment, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A scoping review of real-world data sources for retrospective oncology analysis in Japan.ESMO real world data and digital oncology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAs populations age worldwide, breast cancer mortality among older patients continues to rise despite therapeutic advances. This study investigates differences in treatment patterns and outcomes between older and younger patients with metastatic breast cancer.
methodsWe analyzed clinical data from the Advanced Breast Cancer Database (ABCD) maintained by the Japanese Breast Cancer Research Group. The dataset included patients registered between June 1, 2020, and October 31, 2023, encompassing clinicopathologic information, treatment details, breast cancer specific survival (BCSS), and overall survival (OS).
resultsA total of 1629 patients were included. The frequency of chemotherapy and genomic testing decreased with age, yet patients in their 70 s demonstrated treatment durations and survival outcomes comparable to those of younger patients. In contrast, patients aged ≥ 80 years exhibited shorter duration of second-line therapy (adjusted HR:0.65, 95% CI: 0.43-1.04) and poorer OS (adjusted HR:0.62, 95% CI: 0.37-1.04) and BCSS (adjusted HR:0.66, 95% CI: 0.38-1.14), despite most deaths being attributable to breast cancer rather than non-cancer-related causes.
conclusionsThis multicenter retrospective study demonstrates that patients in their 70 s can achieve comparable benefits from systemic therapy to younger individuals, emphasizing the importance of not withholding treatment based solely on chronological age. Conversely, the limited effectiveness of later-line therapies in patients aged ≥ 80 highlights the need for individualized treatment strategies that balance efficacy, quality of life, and comorbidities through comprehensive geriatric assessment and shared decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41903009What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.