ArticleSleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung2026
Gender differences in the psychosocial and functional impact of obstructive sleep apnea: findings from the SHINE patient survey.
Article in Sleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Beyond the apnea-hypopnea index: a call to action for a multidimensional evaluation in obstructive sleep apnea.Frontiers in sleep · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeObstructive sleep apnea (OSA) affects nearly 1 billion people worldwide and is associated with significant cardiometabolic, neurocognitive, and psychosocial consequences. Gender differences in symptom presentation may contribute to underdiagnosis and unmet needs, particularly among women. This study aimed to assess gender-specific differences in the psychosocial burden of OSA using the Sleep Health Inquiries on Needs and Emotions (SHINE) survey.
methodsThe SHINE survey was conducted in 2024 among 1,500 U.S. adults with self-reported OSA. Participants completed validated items across five domains: work productivity, daily non-work activities, OSA symptoms, relationships, and negative feelings. Gender differences were examined using descriptive statistics, chi-square tests, and multivariable generalized linear models adjusted for demographics, comorbidities, and OSA severity.
resultsRespondents included 755 men (50.3%) and 745 women (49.7%). Women were younger, had higher rates of psychological comorbidities (e.g., anxiety: 64.6% vs. 43.2%, p<0.001), and reported more non-classic OSA symptoms, while men more frequently reported cardiometabolic conditions. In adjusted analyses, women were 46% more likely to report OSA impacting daily non-work activities (p=0.01) and 52% more likely to experience ≥2 OSA symptoms in the prior 30 days (p=0.04). No significant gender differences were observed in work productivity impairment after adjustment, although greater symptom burden and negative feelings were associated with work limitations across both sexes.
conclusionsWomen with OSA reported broader symptom profiles, more daily activity limitations, and greater emotional burden than men. These findings highlight the need for gender-sensitive screening and personalized treatment approaches to improve diagnosis and management of OSA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.