ArticlePediatric radiology2026
Dynamic digital radiography as a minimally invasive alternative to perfusion scintigraphy for assessing pulmonary blood flow in children: a prospective study.
Article in Pediatric radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn congenital diaphragmatic hernia, postoperative right-left asymmetry of pulmonary perfusion affects outcome. Although pulmonary perfusion scintigraphy (PPS) is widely used to assess pulmonary perfusion, it requires the use of radionuclides and peripheral venous access. In contrast, dynamic digital radiography (DDR) visualizes and analyzes pulmonary perfusion by extracting subtle changes in X-ray attenuation from sequential images acquired using a pulsed X-ray generator and a flat-panel detector.
objectiveThis study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of DDR for assessing pulmonary perfusion in children and verify the associated radiation dose. MATERIALS AND
methodsConsecutive congenital diaphragmatic hernia survivors aged 5-7 years scheduled for routine PPS between January 2024 and June 2025 underwent DDR on the same day. The images were analyzed using a dedicated workstation. For each modality, we calculated the blood-flow ratio in the affected lung and assessed the agreement using Pearson correlation and Bland-Altman analysis. Effective doses were also compared.
resultsThirteen children (median age, 6.07 years; 10 left-sided diaphragmatic hernia) were included in the study. DDR-derived blood-flow ratio strongly correlated with PPS (r=0.977, P<0.01), with absolute inter-method blood-flow ratio differences <5%. Neither fixed nor proportional bias was observed. The median effective dose for DDR was 0.16 mSv-significantly lower than that for PPS (2.09 mSv). The blood-flow ratio calculated using DDR correlated well with the scintigraphy results.
conclusionDDR could serve as a minimally invasive, low-dose alternative to PPS for the evaluation of pulmonary perfusion. Future validation in a broader pediatric population is warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41902931What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.