Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41902925›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2026

Combination of quantitative MRI and laboratory markers for the detection and staging of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease.

Nienke P M Wassenaar, Koen C van Son, Bas Voermans, Kirsi M A van Eekhout, Marian A Troelstra, Stan Driessen, Anne Line Mak, Julia J Witjes, Anne-Marieke van Dijk, Veera Houttu and 8 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Nienke P M Wassenaar *Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. n.p.wassenaar@amsterdamumc.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3668-944X
Koen C van Son *Vascular Medicine, Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Bas VoermansVascular Medicine, Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Kirsi M A van EekhoutVascular Medicine, Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Marian A TroelstraRadiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Stan DriessenVascular Medicine, Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Anne Line MakVascular Medicine, Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Julia J WitjesVascular Medicine, Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Anne-Marieke van DijkVascular Medicine, Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Veera HouttuVascular Medicine, Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Diona ZwirsVascular Medicine, Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Elizabeth ShumbayawondaPerspectum Ltd., Oxford, United Kingdom.
Max NieuwdorpVascular Medicine, Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Michail DoukasDepartment of Pathology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Joanne VerheijAmsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology Metabolism (AGEM) Institute, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Aart J NederveenRadiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Oliver J Gurney-ChampionRadiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Adriaan G HolleboomVascular Medicine, Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesMetabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) is increasing both in numbers and severity worldwide. Non-invasive alternatives to liver biopsy, particularly for the detection of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH), have proven difficult to establish. We aimed to assess whether quantitative MRI (qMRI) alone and in combination with laboratory and anthropometric measurements and other non-invasive tests (NITs) can detect stages of MASLD. MATERIALS AND

methodsIn this single-center prospective cohort study, 91 participants with hepatic steatosis on ultrasound or vibration-controlled transient elastography were enrolled in the outpatient clinics between September 2018 and January 2024. Patients underwent blood sampling, qMRI and liver biopsy. Non-invasive parameters were correlated with histopathology in all 91 participants, of whom 37 were reported previously. Prediction models for advanced steatosis (S3), MASH, fibro-MASH (S ≥ 1, lobular inflammation ≥ 1, hepatocyte ballooning ≥ 1 and F ≥ 2), significant (≥ F2) and advanced (≥ F3) fibrosis were designed based on 88 MASLD patients.

resultsMR elastography (MRE)-derived elasticity (MRE-G'), MRE-derived stiffness (MRE-Gabs) and LiverMultiScan® iron-corrected T1 (cT1) correlated with hepatocyte ballooning (Spearman's R: 0.45 (p < 0.001); 0.42 (p < 0.001); 0.38 (p < 0.001)). Prediction models for ≥ F3 outperformed MAF5 and FIB4, but did not outperform ELF or NFS. A model combining cT1, MRE-G', aspartate aminotransferase and alanine aminotransferase yielded an AUC of 0.83 (95% CI: 0.74-0.93) for fibro-MASH, not outperforming FibroScan-AST-score (FAST) or cT1-AST-fasting glucose score (cTAG) (p = 0.130; p = 0.284).

conclusionqMRI parameters are able to differentiate degrees of MASLD severity. Generally, the addition of other available measurements did not significantly improve accuracy compared to individual qMRI parameters or established NITs. KEY POINTS: Question Refinement of non-invasive tools is needed to accurately stage metabolic-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD), particularly progressive disease and significant and advanced fibrosis. Findings Quantitative MRI has good diagnostic accuracy to stage MASLD. The combination of MRI parameters with laboratory and anthropometric measurements has limited additional benefit. Clinical relevance This research provides valuable insights for clinicians seeking to reduce reliance on liver biopsy. The findings could be applied in clinical settings to guide earlier, less invasive diagnosis and disease monitoring, allowing for timely interventions and more personalized treatment strategies.

Indexed as

Fatty LiverMagnetic Resonance ImagingNon-alcoholic Fatty Liver DiseaseAdultAgedBiomarkersBiopsyElasticity Imaging TechniquesFemaleHumansLiverMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesSeverity of Illness IndexBiomarkersBiomarkersFibrosisMASHMASLDMultiparametric magnetic resonance imaging

Identifiers

PMID41902925
PMCPMC13342414

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.