ArticleEuropean radiology2026
Combination of quantitative MRI and laboratory markers for the detection and staging of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease.
Article in European radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesMetabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) is increasing both in numbers and severity worldwide. Non-invasive alternatives to liver biopsy, particularly for the detection of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH), have proven difficult to establish. We aimed to assess whether quantitative MRI (qMRI) alone and in combination with laboratory and anthropometric measurements and other non-invasive tests (NITs) can detect stages of MASLD. MATERIALS AND
methodsIn this single-center prospective cohort study, 91 participants with hepatic steatosis on ultrasound or vibration-controlled transient elastography were enrolled in the outpatient clinics between September 2018 and January 2024. Patients underwent blood sampling, qMRI and liver biopsy. Non-invasive parameters were correlated with histopathology in all 91 participants, of whom 37 were reported previously. Prediction models for advanced steatosis (S3), MASH, fibro-MASH (S ≥ 1, lobular inflammation ≥ 1, hepatocyte ballooning ≥ 1 and F ≥ 2), significant (≥ F2) and advanced (≥ F3) fibrosis were designed based on 88 MASLD patients.
resultsMR elastography (MRE)-derived elasticity (MRE-G'), MRE-derived stiffness (MRE-Gabs) and LiverMultiScan® iron-corrected T1 (cT1) correlated with hepatocyte ballooning (Spearman's R: 0.45 (p < 0.001); 0.42 (p < 0.001); 0.38 (p < 0.001)). Prediction models for ≥ F3 outperformed MAF5 and FIB4, but did not outperform ELF or NFS. A model combining cT1, MRE-G', aspartate aminotransferase and alanine aminotransferase yielded an AUC of 0.83 (95% CI: 0.74-0.93) for fibro-MASH, not outperforming FibroScan-AST-score (FAST) or cT1-AST-fasting glucose score (cTAG) (p = 0.130; p = 0.284).
conclusionqMRI parameters are able to differentiate degrees of MASLD severity. Generally, the addition of other available measurements did not significantly improve accuracy compared to individual qMRI parameters or established NITs. KEY POINTS: Question Refinement of non-invasive tools is needed to accurately stage metabolic-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD), particularly progressive disease and significant and advanced fibrosis. Findings Quantitative MRI has good diagnostic accuracy to stage MASLD. The combination of MRI parameters with laboratory and anthropometric measurements has limited additional benefit. Clinical relevance This research provides valuable insights for clinicians seeking to reduce reliance on liver biopsy. The findings could be applied in clinical settings to guide earlier, less invasive diagnosis and disease monitoring, allowing for timely interventions and more personalized treatment strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.