ArticleNaunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology2026
Gypenosides as a potential bacteriostatic agent against Escherichia coli: dual mechanistic insights from host target network analysis and in vitro validation.
Article in Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Escherichia coli (E. coli) led to increasingly severe issues of antimicrobial resistance, underscoring an urgent need for the development of novel antibacterial strategies. Gypenosides (GPs), the primary active constituents of the medicinal and edible plant Gynostemma pentaphyllum, possess a variety of pharmacological activities, including anti-inflammatory and immunomodulatory effects. However, their antibacterial mechanisms against E. coli remain unclear. Therefore, this study integrated network pharmacology, molecular docking, molecular dynamics simulations, and in vitro experiments to elucidate the antibacterial mechanism of GPs from the dual perspective of the host and the pathogen. The results indicated that network pharmacology analysis identified 72 common targets, among which STAT3, MTOR, AKT1, HSP90AA1, ESR1, and IL6 were predicted as core regulatory nodes. Molecular docking and molecular dynamics simulations confirmed that GP XLIX, the main active component of GPs, exhibit stable binding ability to targets such as IL6, with its binding site located in the peripheral region of the IL6 receptor-binding epitope (Site I). In vitro experiments demonstrated that at inhibitory concentrations, GPs disrupt the integrity of the bacterial cell membrane, and even at sub-inhibitory concentrations, they significantly inhibit bacterial swarming motility, revealing a multi-target, systemic antibacterial profile. In summary, GPs possess the dual potential for direct antibacterial action and host-mediated indirect effects, providing a theoretical foundation for the development of antibacterial agents based on natural products and their application in the food and biomedical fields.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41902853What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.