Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41902850›Full record

ReviewJournal of chemical ecology2026

Harnessing Allelopathic Autotoxicity for Invasive Plant Management: Knowledge Gaps and Future Research Directions.

Elizabeth A Esser, Gary N Ervin, Rima D Lucardi, Paul M Severns, Erika D Womack-Peoples, Steven H Bullard, Ashley N Schulz

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of chemical ecology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Elizabeth A EsserCollege of Forest Resources, Mississippi State University, PO Box 9681, Starkville, MS, 39762, USA. eae197@msstate.edu.
Gary N ErvinDepartment of Biological Sciences, Mississippi State University, PO Box GY, Starkville, MS, 39762, USA.
Rima D LucardiUSDA Forest Service, Southern Research Station, 320 E Green St, Athens, GA, 30602, USA.
Paul M SevernsUniversity of Georgia, 2315 Miller Plant Sciences, 120 Carlton St, Athens, GA, 30602, USA.
Erika D Womack-PeoplesDepartment of Biochemistry, Nutrition, and Health Promotion, Mississippi State University, Starkville, MS, 39762, USA.
Steven H BullardCollege of Forest Resources, Mississippi State University, PO Box 9681, Starkville, MS, 39762, USA.
Ashley N SchulzCollege of Forest Resources, Mississippi State University, PO Box 9681, Starkville, MS, 39762, USA.

Funding

McIntire-Stennis MISZ-069550Southern Research Station 23JV11330160055
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nuisance species are typically managed using mechanical removal, biological, cultural, or chemical treatments, applied either individually or in combination. Applications of synthetic pesticides may result in significant non-target effects that reduce biodiversity or result in pesticide drift, and target organisms can rapidly develop pesticide resistance. Biological control has less physical impact on ecosystems than mechanical removal, and none of the human health concerns of synthetic pesticides, but relies on coevolved antagonists that are introduced to the invaded environments and can have non-target effects (e.g., outcompeting native species, switching to non-target native organisms, and ineffectively suppressing the target organism). Due to increasing restrictions, it is becoming more difficult to import, propagate, and release new biological control agents. These concerns, in combination with the increased rates of species invasion and economic and ecological costs of existing control methods, necessitate alternative means of nuisance species control. In this review, we examine an alternative control approach based on the principles of allelopathy and autotoxicity. Autotoxins used in this manner exploit secondary metabolites produced by a target species and/or their endosymbionts to inhibit growth or induce mortality with reduced non-target impacts. We synthesized autotoxicity-related literature to compare plant-derived autotoxins to traditional biological and chemical controls and discuss how further autotoxicity research and development can assist with the control of nuisance plant species. Although autotoxins provide a promising new frontier for nuisance species control, further research is necessary to effectively develop, test, and deploy these biochemical controls for species inhibition or mortality.

Indexed as

AllelopathyIntroduced SpeciesPlantsAnimalsAllelopathyAutotoxicityBiological controlInvasive speciesSecondary metabolites

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.