ReviewJournal of chemical ecology2026
Harnessing Allelopathic Autotoxicity for Invasive Plant Management: Knowledge Gaps and Future Research Directions.
Review in Journal of chemical ecology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Impact of Angiosperm Tree-Derived Allelochemicals on Physiological Responses of Acceptor Plants-A Systematic Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Nuisance species are typically managed using mechanical removal, biological, cultural, or chemical treatments, applied either individually or in combination. Applications of synthetic pesticides may result in significant non-target effects that reduce biodiversity or result in pesticide drift, and target organisms can rapidly develop pesticide resistance. Biological control has less physical impact on ecosystems than mechanical removal, and none of the human health concerns of synthetic pesticides, but relies on coevolved antagonists that are introduced to the invaded environments and can have non-target effects (e.g., outcompeting native species, switching to non-target native organisms, and ineffectively suppressing the target organism). Due to increasing restrictions, it is becoming more difficult to import, propagate, and release new biological control agents. These concerns, in combination with the increased rates of species invasion and economic and ecological costs of existing control methods, necessitate alternative means of nuisance species control. In this review, we examine an alternative control approach based on the principles of allelopathy and autotoxicity. Autotoxins used in this manner exploit secondary metabolites produced by a target species and/or their endosymbionts to inhibit growth or induce mortality with reduced non-target impacts. We synthesized autotoxicity-related literature to compare plant-derived autotoxins to traditional biological and chemical controls and discuss how further autotoxicity research and development can assist with the control of nuisance plant species. Although autotoxins provide a promising new frontier for nuisance species control, further research is necessary to effectively develop, test, and deploy these biochemical controls for species inhibition or mortality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41902850What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.