Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41902847›Full record

ArticleOecologia2026

Wind conditions do not consistently affect large-scale movement decisions of large savanna herbivores.

Sara Gomez, Melinda Boyers, Alexandre Caron, Daniel Cornelis, Henjo de Knegt, Michel de Garine-Wichatitsky, Jasper A J Eikelboom, J Werner Kilian, Norman Owen-Smith, Thomas Prin and 5 more

Erratum issuedAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Oecologia, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Sara GomezCEFE, Univ Montpellier, CNRS, EPHE, IRD, Montpellier, France. gomez.sara@icloud.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1299-7509
Melinda BoyersSchool of Biodiversity, One Health and Veterinary Medicine, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, G128QQ, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7129-8949
Alexandre CaronUMR ASTRE, Univ. Montpellier, CIRAD, INRAE, Montpellier, France.
Daniel CornelisUPR Forêts Et Sociétés, CIRAD, Montpellier, France.
Henjo de KnegtWildlife Ecology and Conservation Group, Wageningen University and Research, Droevendaalsesteeg 3, 6708 PB, Wageningen, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2105-6970
Michel de Garine-WichatitskyCIRAD, UMR ASTRE, Montpellier, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5438-1473
Jasper A J EikelboomLaboratory of Geo-Information Science and Remote Sensing, Wageningen University and Research, Droevendaalsesteeg 3, 6708 PB, Wageningen, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5107-4427
J Werner KilianEtosha Ecological Institute, Etosha National Park, Okaukuejo, Namibia.
Norman Owen-SmithCentre for African Ecology, School of Animal, Plant and Environmental Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Wits, 2050, South Africa.
Thomas PrinNyati Consulting, Paris, France.
Adrian M ShraderDepartment of Zoology and Entomology, University of Pretoria, Private Bag X20, Hatfield, 0028, South Africa.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6451-6132
Jared A StabachConservation Ecology Center, Smithsonian National Zoo and Conservation Biology Institute, Front Royal, VA, 22630, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7896-1237
Wendy C TurnerU.S. Geological Survey, Wisconsin Cooperative Wildlife Research Unit, Department of Forest and Wildlife Ecology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 1630 Linden Drive, Madison, WI, 53706, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0302-1646
Frank van LangeveldeWildlife Ecology and Conservation Group, Wageningen University and Research, Droevendaalsesteeg 3, 6708 PB, Wageningen, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8870-0797
Simon Chamaillé-JammesCEFE, Univ Montpellier, CNRS, EPHE, IRD, Montpellier, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To decide where and when to move, animals combine memorised information with environmental cues. Wind speed and direction can affect the way animals perceive the environment by reducing the detection and shaping the spatial distribution of sensory cues. Although these cues are expected to be used for forage localisation and predation avoidance in large herbivores, for instance, we still do not know to what extent wind can ultimately influence their large-scale movement decisions. To tackle this knowledge gap, we used GPS data from four species of large African herbivores experiencing contrasted predation risks (blue wildebeest, Connochaetes taurinus, plain zebras, Equus quagga, African buffalo, Syncerus caffer, African elephant, Loxodonta africana), in multiple protected areas. We first investigated whether individuals reduce predation risk by avoiding long-distance movements under windy conditions. We then analysed whether they favour moving upwind to maximise their information gain as they travel. We found no clear decrease in the largest step length as wind speed increases and suggest that local habitat could buffer the strength of wind speed (i.e. topography or vegetation). We, however, found that large herbivores tend to move upwind rather than cross- or downwind, although the effect was generally small. We point out that individuals might be more constrained in their use of cues carried by the wind than initially thought, due to the existence of dominant wind directions at all sites. Altogether, our study suggests that wind has little general, consistent, effects on large herbivore movement decisions. Some sites or species-specific results, however, call for delving deeper into the context-specificity of wind effects.

Indexed as

HerbivoryWindAnimalsGrasslandMovementGPS dataMovement behaviourOlfactionPredator–preySensory cues

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.