ArticleOecologia2026
Wind conditions do not consistently affect large-scale movement decisions of large savanna herbivores.
Article in Oecologia, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Riding out the storm: Behavioural responses of a large herbivore to high-Arctic winds.The Journal of animal ecology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To decide where and when to move, animals combine memorised information with environmental cues. Wind speed and direction can affect the way animals perceive the environment by reducing the detection and shaping the spatial distribution of sensory cues. Although these cues are expected to be used for forage localisation and predation avoidance in large herbivores, for instance, we still do not know to what extent wind can ultimately influence their large-scale movement decisions. To tackle this knowledge gap, we used GPS data from four species of large African herbivores experiencing contrasted predation risks (blue wildebeest, Connochaetes taurinus, plain zebras, Equus quagga, African buffalo, Syncerus caffer, African elephant, Loxodonta africana), in multiple protected areas. We first investigated whether individuals reduce predation risk by avoiding long-distance movements under windy conditions. We then analysed whether they favour moving upwind to maximise their information gain as they travel. We found no clear decrease in the largest step length as wind speed increases and suggest that local habitat could buffer the strength of wind speed (i.e. topography or vegetation). We, however, found that large herbivores tend to move upwind rather than cross- or downwind, although the effect was generally small. We point out that individuals might be more constrained in their use of cues carried by the wind than initially thought, due to the existence of dominant wind directions at all sites. Altogether, our study suggests that wind has little general, consistent, effects on large herbivore movement decisions. Some sites or species-specific results, however, call for delving deeper into the context-specificity of wind effects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41902847What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.