Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41902841›Full record

ArticleATS scholar2026

ATS BEAR Cage: 10 years of building education to advance research with innovation, competition, and fun.

Jason P Kirkness, Dayna Howell, Vlada K O'Hara, Michelle Turenne, Courtney Crim, Nina M Patel, Joshua P Fessel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ATS scholar, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jason P KirknessMedical and Clinical Affairs-Respiratory, SMSbiotech, San Diego, CA, United States.ORCID 0009-0003-8141-8790
Dayna HowellAmerican Thoracic Society, New York, NY, United States.
Vlada K O'HaraAmerican Thoracic Society, New York, NY, United States.
Michelle TurenneAmerican Thoracic Society, New York, NY, United States.
Courtney CrimUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Department of Medicine, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-3391-2490
Nina M PatelBoehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals Inc., Ridgefield, CT, United States.
Joshua P FesselIndependent consultant, Rockville, MD, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-0797-7693

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Beginning in 2014, the American Thoracic Society (ATS) launched the Building Education to Advance Research (BEAR) Cage competition, with the first in-person competition held in 2015. Organized and run by the ATS Drug/Device Discovery and Development Committee, the BEAR Cage competition is structured as a " pitch competition" where early career investigators submit streamlined proposals for out-of-the-box and potentially transformative ideas, and the 3 top proposals are invited to attend the ATS International Conference to pitch their ideas and compete for cash prizes. Over the first 10 years of its existence, the BEAR Cage has not only grown as a venue for some of the most exciting and creative ideas at the ATS conference, it has also shown itself to be associated with future success, with BEAR Cage finalists emerging as leaders across the pulmonary, critical care, and sleep medicine enterprise. In this Perspective, we provide an overview of the ATS BEAR Cage's first 10 years and offer thoughts on the continued importance of the BEAR Cage as a place for innovation, competition, and fun to coexist.

Indexed as

Biomedical ResearchAcademiaCongresses as TopicHumansSocieties, ScientificUnited States

Identifiers

PMID41902841
PMCPMC13220940

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.