ArticleAnnals of botany2026
Grazing mediates microclimate effects on lichen performance near its warm-range margin.
Article in Annals of botany, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
aimsClimate influences species performance and distribution both directly, through physiological constraints, and indirectly, by modulating biotic interactions. However, the relative importance of these pathways remains poorly understood, limiting our ability to predict species responses to environmental change. Here, we investigated how microclimate influences the growth of a cold-adapted lichen both directly and indirectly, through effects on mollusc grazing, and whether these effects differ among populations of different origins.
methodsWe conducted a transplant experiment using lobes of Peltigera aphthosa collected from five geographically distant populations along a 1200-km latitudinal gradient in Sweden. The lobes were transplanted to 56 forest sites spanning a broad microclimatic gradient near the species' warm-range margin in Sweden, and we monitored their growth and grazing damage for one year. Using piecewise structural equation models, we quantified the direct and indirect effects of microclimate through grazing on lichen growth and assessed whether these effects differed among source populations. KEY
resultsWe found no evidence for direct effects of microclimate on lichen growth. Instead, microclimate indirectly influenced growth through mollusc grazing. Grazing damage increased with warmer temperatures (more growing degree days) and higher air humidity (lower vapour pressure deficit) during the growing season and grazing reduced lichen growth. While population origin did not affect direct responses to microclimate, populations differed in their susceptibility to grazing.
conclusionsOur study highlights the importance of indirect microclimatic effects mediated by biotic interactions in shaping species performance near its warm-range margin. The absence of direct microclimatic effects, combined with intraspecific variation in susceptibility to grazing, underscores the need to consider both biotic interactions and differences among populations when predicting species responses to climate change. Transplant experiments across microclimatic gradients offer a valuable method to gain insights into the complex interplay between local adaptation and abiotic and biotic factors of species performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.