Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41902676›Full record

ArticleChimia2026

Nanopore Studies of DNA Damage and G-quadruplex Folding in the Human Telomere Sequence.

Aaron M Fleming, Cynthia J Burrows

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Chimia, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Aaron M FlemingDepartment of Chemistry, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112-0850, United States. afleming@chem.utah.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-2000-0310
Cynthia J BurrowsDepartment of Chemistry, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112-0850, United States. burrows@chem.utah.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-7253-8529

Funding

Nanopore Detection of DNA DamageR01GM093099 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI BURROWS, CYNTHIA J · 2011 to 2021
$3.0M
Chemical Modifications in Regulatory Regions of DNA and RNAR35GM145237 · NIGMS · UTAH STATE HIGHER EDUCATION SYSTEM--UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI Cynthia J Burrows · 2022 to 2026
$2.3M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM093099NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM145237NIH HHS R01 GM093099NIH HHS R35 GM145237
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The bacterial pore-forming toxin α-hemolysin has dimensions appropriate for capture and translocation of DNA strands in a single-molecule electrophoresis experiment. We used the nanopore's properties to study G-quadruplex unfolding in the human telomere repeat sequence with and without the presence of DNA lesions introduced into either the GGG tracks of a potential G-quadruplex (via oxidation) or the TTA loops (via photodimerization). Different topological folds of the G-quadruplex could be distinguished by either their current-time signatures or by their unfolding rates when a dA25 tail was added. Another more compact four-stranded structure, the i-motif, was also studied and found to be exceptionally well folded and stable inside the nanopore cavity. Comparisons are made between early studies with a home-built nanopore device vs. the currently available instrument from Oxford Nanopore Technologies (ONT), showing that we approach, but do not yet achieve, single-molecule sequencing of DNA damage sites in human telomere repeats. These studies aid in our understanding of the structure and dynamics of non-canonically folded DNA, its behaviour in crowded environments that mimic intracellular conditions, and the ability to use nanopore sequencing to identify DNA damage sites in this oxidation-prone segment of the genome.

Indexed as

DNA DamageG-QuadruplexesNanoporesTelomereHumansDNA damageG-quadruplexi-MotifNanoporeTelomere

Identifiers

PMID41902676
PMCPMC13334806

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.