Trial reportEpilepsia2026
Deep brain stimulation of the thalamus for intractable epilepsy (FRANCE study): A randomized clinical trial.
Trial report in Epilepsia, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
31 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThis study was undertaken to evaluate the efficacy and safety of deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the anterior nucleus of the thalamus (ANT) compared with best medical treatment (BMT) in patients with drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE).
methodsThis randomized, open-label, phase 3 controlled trial was conducted across 14 specialized epilepsy and DBS centers. Eligible participants were adults with focal or multifocal DRE who had previously failed vagus nerve stimulation (VNS). Sixty-one patients were randomized 1:1 either to receive continuous bilateral ANT-DBS (n = 30) or to continue BMT, including VNS (n = 31), for 12 months. Afterward, patients in the BMT group were offered delayed ANT-DBS and followed for an additional year. The primary outcome was the change in monthly severe seizure frequency (defined on the modified Chalfont Scale) at 12 months. Safety outcomes were also recorded.
resultsAmong 67 screened patients, 61 were enrolled. At 12 months, median seizure reduction was greater in the DBS group (-44%, interquartile range [IQR] = -67 to 0) versus the BMT group (-6%, IQR = -56 to 20; p = .09); 44.5% of patients in the DBS group achieved a ≥50% reduction in seizure frequency compared to 27% in the BMT group. Within-group analyses showed significant seizure reductions in the DBS group at both 12 months (-44%, p < .001) and 24 months (-46%, p < .001), as well as in the delayed DBS group at 12 months (-36%, IQR = -73 to -4; p < .001). No significant differences in quality of life were observed between groups, and no major DBS-related adverse events were reported. SIGNIFICANCE: Our study suggests a potential benefit rather than demonstrating superiority of ANT-DBS over medical therapy. However, within-group improvements and favorable safety profile support the use of ANT-DBS as a palliative treatment option in patients with DRE who have failed VNS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.