ReviewComprehensive reviews in food science and food safety2026
Advances in Wine Yeast Autolysis: Biochemical and Molecular Mechanisms, and the Release of Organic Compounds in White and Sparkling Wines-An Updated Review.
Review in Comprehensive reviews in food science and food safety, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Uncorking wine yeast genomics from grape to glass.FEMS yeast research · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Wine yeasts play a central role in alcoholic fermentation and significantly contribute to the sensory attributes of wines through cellular autolysis during lees aging (sur lie), especially in white wines. This process releases organic compounds that alter the wine's chemical and sensory profile. In addition to traditional aging, the use of commercial yeast derivatives and emerging technologies has enabled accelerated autolysis. This review compiles recent studies on white and sparkling wines, highlighting the predominance of Saccharomyces cerevisiae and the growing interest in non-Saccharomyces yeasts. Most research focuses on sparkling wines produced by the traditional method, typically involving autolysis periods ranging from 6 to 18 months, temperatures between 12°C and 18°C, and the frequent use of synthetic wine models. The volatile fraction associated with autolysis has gained attention, with diethyl succinate proposed as a key marker, despite inconsistent findings. Genes related to autophagy are being explored as molecular markers of autolytic potential, and techniques such as ATR-FTIR and NMR spectroscopy are being used to screen yeast strains. Emerging technologies-including pulsed electric fields, high-hydrostatic pressure, high-pressure homogenization, ultrasound, microwaves-show promise in enhancing autolysis and improving the release of desirable compounds. However, agronomic and technological variability challenge the generalization of specific outcomes. This underscores the need to expand research into underexplored wine categories, such as sparkling wines produced by the Charmat method, long-maceration white wines, and low-intervention wines, in which residual yeast cells may remain at bottling and potentially influence the final sensory profile.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.