ArticleHistopathology2026
Validating the 2022 WHO classification in thyroid carcinomas: Prospective evidence for predicting iodine resistance.
Article in Histopathology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo validate whether the 2022 WHO classification improves the prediction of radioactive iodine refractory (RAIR) disease in advanced-stage thyroid carcinomas and to identify associated histological predictive factors. METHODS AND
resultsA prospective cohort of 253 patients with pT3, pT4, or M1 thyroid carcinomas (TNM 2010), who underwent surgery between 2009 and 2018 and received at least one radioactive iodine dose, was analysed. Histological slides were reviewed using the 2022 WHO criteria, and clinical data were collected. Cox survival analyses and ROC curve evaluations were performed to identify factors associated with RAIR progression and assess the predictive performance of the new classification. Reclassification identified 28 low-risk neoplasms, all with favourable outcomes. Among the remaining 225 malignant cases, 155 were well-differentiated carcinomas (including 146 papillary carcinomas, 56 of which were aggressive subtypes) and 70 were high-grade carcinomas (39 high-grade differentiated and 31 poorly differentiated carcinomas). Forty patients (17.7%) developed RAIR disease. The 2022 WHO classification showed superior predictive performance compared with the 2004 WHO (AUC: 0.81 versus 0.60, P < 0.001). Multivariate analysis identified tumour necrosis as independent predictive factor of RAIR disease, regardless of the mitotic index.
conclusionThe 2022 WHO classification improves RAIR disease prediction, notably by recognizing high-grade carcinomas as a distinct entity. High-grade factors, especially tumour necrosis, which emerges as a key predictive factor, should be systematically reported in thyroid carcinoma pathology reports to enhance patient management and follow-up.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.