Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41902403›Full record

ArticleBiophysical journal2026

Optimizing scheduling in dual-pulse nucleoside labeling experiments for cell-cycle analysis.

Alastar Phelan, Constandina Pospori, Cristina Lo Celso, Chiu Fan Lee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biophysical journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Alastar PhelanDepartment of Bioengineering, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Constandina PosporiDepartment of Life Sciences, Imperial College London, London, UK; The Francis Crick Institute, London, UK.
Cristina Lo CelsoDepartment of Life Sciences, Imperial College London, London, UK; The Francis Crick Institute, London, UK.
Chiu Fan LeeDepartment of Bioengineering, Imperial College London, London, UK. Electronic address: c.lee@imperial.ac.uk.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

All eukaryotic cells go through a universal sequence of phases during their division cycle, where the phase timings vary according to cell type and state. Dual-pulse nucleoside labeling (DPNL) is a standard, widely applicable experimental DNA base-substituting technique to probe cell-cycle kinetics at the population level, including in living organisms. In such an experimental protocol, a key scheduling parameter is the choice of waiting time between the two labeling pulses. Here, we model population cell-cycle dynamics as a three-stage Poisson process with an idealized S-phase labeling step and use a simulation-based look-up procedure to demonstrate that the inter-pulse waiting time can be optimized to maximize the signal-to-noise ratio of inferred cycle parameters-an issue that is especially critical in DPNL experiments with limited cell numbers and replicates. An optimal choice of pulse scheduling typically improves S-phase time inference by 50% compared to a suboptimal choice. We further discuss the procedure to perform such a task in an experimentally relevant setting.

Indexed as

Cell CycleCytological TechniquesEukaryotic CellsAnimalsBromodeoxyuridineCell CountDeoxyuridineHumansKineticsLeukemia, Myeloid, AcuteNucleosidesS PhaseWorkflow5-ethynyl-2'-deoxyuridineBromodeoxyuridineDeoxyuridineNucleosides

Identifiers

PMID41902403
PMCPMC13351721

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.