ArticleBiophysical journal2026
Optimizing scheduling in dual-pulse nucleoside labeling experiments for cell-cycle analysis.
Article in Biophysical journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
All eukaryotic cells go through a universal sequence of phases during their division cycle, where the phase timings vary according to cell type and state. Dual-pulse nucleoside labeling (DPNL) is a standard, widely applicable experimental DNA base-substituting technique to probe cell-cycle kinetics at the population level, including in living organisms. In such an experimental protocol, a key scheduling parameter is the choice of waiting time between the two labeling pulses. Here, we model population cell-cycle dynamics as a three-stage Poisson process with an idealized S-phase labeling step and use a simulation-based look-up procedure to demonstrate that the inter-pulse waiting time can be optimized to maximize the signal-to-noise ratio of inferred cycle parameters-an issue that is especially critical in DPNL experiments with limited cell numbers and replicates. An optimal choice of pulse scheduling typically improves S-phase time inference by 50% compared to a suboptimal choice. We further discuss the procedure to perform such a task in an experimentally relevant setting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.