ArticleWomen's health (London, England)
Patient perspectives on the clinical management of pregnancy-related hypertension: A qualitative data analysis.
Article in Women's health (London, England). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDPs) are common pregnancy complications. The only curative treatment for HDPs is delivery. However, studies have shown that low-dose aspirin reduces the risks of HDPs.
objectivesThe aims of this study were to elucidate barriers and facilitators to implementing evidence-based treatment to prevent HDPs from the patient perspective; and to characterize patient clinical experiences of the management of HDPs.
designA cross-sectional qualitative study.
methodsSix focus groups were conducted with 26 birthing people who were pregnant between 2017 and 2024 with a history of HDPs. Thematic analysis was conducted by three independent coders using an ethnographic approach.
resultsPatient experiences of optimal versus suboptimal care were characterized by three main areas: counseling and communication practices; decision-making practices; and intentionality of care. Intentionality as a guiding principle resulted in detailed counseling and communication of symptoms, severity, evidence-based management options, and implications. Additionally, intentional communication practices supported patient-provider relationship building and increased shared decision-making.
conclusionsPatient experiences emphasize the need for healthcare providers to adopt more intentional, personalized approaches to care. It is crucial to acknowledge existing power dynamics and take deliberate steps to ensure that care remains patient centered. An intentional approach enhances patient confidence in the care team, promotes greater patient activation, and supports uptake of preventive measures such as low-dose aspirin.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.