ReviewViruses2026
Bridging the Gap: The PrEP Cascade Paradigm Shift for Long-Acting Injectable HIV Prevention.
Review in Viruses, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Long-acting injectable HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (LAI-PrEP) demonstrates superior efficacy and persistence compared to daily oral PrEP. However, real-world implementation reveals that only 52.9% of prescribed individuals initiate treatment with their first injection. This implementation barrier stems from a fundamental mismatch between the traditional PrEP cascade-designed for oral formulations allowing same-day initiation-and LAI-PrEP's unique requirements involving a 2-8 week "bridge period" between prescription and first injection to establish HIV-negative status. We synthesize data from major clinical trials (HPTN 083, HPTN 084, PURPOSE-1/2; >15,000 participants) with real-world implementation studies to characterize bridge period navigation as the critical implementation barrier. This review proposes a reconceptualized PrEP cascade explicitly recognizing the bridge period as a distinct, measurable step requiring dedicated management strategies. We examine pharmacological bases for conservative initiation protocols, quantify population-specific barriers to bridge period completion, and synthesize evidence on strategies to improve initiation success. This paradigm shift from individual behavioral adherence to structural factors within the healthcare system requires parallel innovations in cascade conceptualization, measurement frameworks, and implementation approaches. Addressing this structural barrier is essential to translate LAI-PrEP's extraordinary clinical efficacy (>96%) into meaningful public health impact, particularly for populations experiencing the highest HIV burden.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.