ArticleViruses2026
Development of a Novel Method to Detect AAV Vector Integration.
Article in Viruses, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
AAV integration has become an important safety consideration in gene therapy. However, accurately determining integration sites remains challenging due to biases introduced by library preparation methods, sequencing technologies, and bioinformatic pipelines. In this study, we developed a PCR-free amplification based on a CRISPR-Cas9 cleavage strategy for AAV DNA that overcomes the limitations of PCR amplification imposed by the ITR structure. When combined with long-read nanopore sequencing, this CRISPR-Cas9-based workflow preserves native AAV integration states and enables unbiased detection of integration junctions. We used AAV-transduced HeLa single-cell clones to evaluate the performance of this approach. To confirm integration site identification, AAV integration junctions were also detected using a probe hybridization capture strategy followed by Illumina short-read sequencing. Integration junctions identified by both methods were further confirmed by PCR. The results showed strong consistency between the two approaches in accurately identifying AAV integration sites in each clone. Overall, these findings demonstrate that the CRISPR-Cas9-enabled, PCR-free long-read sequencing workflow provides a promising tool for characterizing AAV integration events.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.