ArticleViruses2026
Analysis of Recombinant Cedar Virus Infection and Cross-Protection Against Related Henipaviruses in African Green Monkeys.
Article in Viruses, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cedar virus (CedV), related to the highly pathogenic bat-borne henipaviruses, Hendra virus (HeV) and Nipah virus (NiV), is non-pathogenic in small animal models, likely due to the inability to produce interferon-antagonist proteins. We evaluated the pathogenesis of recombinant CedV (rCedV) in the African green monkey (AGM) model and determined if prior infection conferred cross-protective immunity against a lethal challenge with NiV Bangladesh (NiV-B) or HeV. AGMs infected with rCedV remained asymptomatic, with no clinical signs of disease or detectable viremia. The rCedV infected animals developed homologous neutralizing antibody responses that failed to cross-neutralize NiV-B or HeV. At 42 days post-rCedV infection, AGMs were challenged with a lethal dose of NiV-B or HeV, and prior infection with rCedV failed to protect against NiV-B challenge, with all animals succumbing to NiV-B. Similarly, rCedV infection did not confer consistent protection against HeV, with 2/4 animals succumbing to lethal HeV. These findings confirm that CedV is non-pathogenic in the AGM model of NiV and HeV infection, justifying its classification as a BSL-2 agent. The findings also demonstrate that rCedV does not elicit a cross-protective immune response to prevent lethal disease from either NiV-B or HeV highlighting significant immunological differences between CedV and the pathogenic henipaviruses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.