ReviewSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Strategies for Class-Imbalanced Learning in Multi-Sensor Medical Imaging.
Review in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This narrative critical review addresses class imbalance in medical imaging, particularly within the context of multi-sensor and multi-modal environments, poses a critical challenge to developing reliable AI diagnostic systems. The integration of heterogeneous data from sources like CT, MRI, and PET presents a unique opportunity to address data scarcity for rare conditions through fusion techniques. This review provides a structured analysis of strategies to tackle class imbalance, categorizing them into data-centric (e.g., advanced resampling like SMOTE-ENC for mixed data types, GAN-based synthesis) and model-centric (e.g., loss function engineering, transfer learning, and ensemble methods) approaches. Crucially, we highlight how multi-sensor feature fusion and decision-level fusion paradigms can inherently enrich representations for minority classes, offering a powerful frontier beyond single-modality learning. We evaluate each method's merits, clinical viability, and compliance considerations (e.g., FDA). Finally, we identify emerging trends where imbalance-aware learning synergizes with multi-sensor fusion frameworks, federated learning, and explainable AI, charting a roadmap toward robust, equitable, and clinically deployable diagnostic tools. Our quantitative synthesis shows that data-centric strategies can improve minority class recall by 12-35% in datasets with imbalance ratios (majority:minority) ≥10:1, while model-centric strategies achieve an average AUC improvement of 0.08-0.21 in multi-sensor medical imaging tasks with sample sizes ranging from 50 to 50,000.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.