SynthesisSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
The Use of Augmented Reality for Navigation in Minimally Invasive Abdominal and Thoracic Soft-Tissue Surgery: A Systematic Review.
Synthesis in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Surgical navigation and augmented reality (AR) are widely used in neurosurgery, spinal surgery, and orthopedics. However, their use in minimally invasive abdominal and thoracic soft-tissue surgery is limited, as tracking deformable, mobile organs is challenging. Recent advances in AR may address these challenges to improve intraoperative navigation. This systematic review, registered in PROSPERO (2024) and based on PRISMA guidelines, analyzes literature from 2014 to 2024 about AR in minimally invasive abdominal and thoracic soft-tissue surgery. It identifies target organs, describes AR hardware and software, and evaluates accuracy levels, usability outcomes, clinical benefits, technical limitations, and research needs. Searches of PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase for English-language studies found 1297 records, of which only 28 (2%) met the inclusion criteria. Nearly half (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.