ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Outdoor Motion Capture at Scale.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Capturing kinematic data in outdoor sports is challenging, as motions span large capture volumes and occur under difficult environmental conditions. Video-based approaches, particularly with pan-tilt-zoom cameras, offer a practical solution, but the extensive manual post-processing required limits their use to short sequences and few athletes. This study presents a motion capture pipeline that automates the detection of both reference points and sport-specific keypoints to overcome this limitation. The field test employed eight cameras covering a 250×80×30 m capture volume with nearly 300 reference points. Ten state-certified ski instructors performed eight standardized maneuvers. Reference points were localized through a hybrid approach combining YOLO object detection and ArUco marker identification. AlphaPose was fine-tuned on a new manually annotated dataset to detect skier-specific keypoints (e.g., skis, poles) alongside anatomical landmarks. Continuous frame-wise calibration and 3D reconstruction were performed using Direct Linear Transformation. Evaluation compared automated detections with manual annotations. Automated reference point detection achieved a mean localization error of 4.1 pixels (0.1% of 4K width) and reduced 3D segment-length variation by 23%. The skier-specific keypoint model reached 98% PCK, mAP of 0.97, and an MPJPE of 10.3 pixels while lowering 3D segment-length variation by 0.5 cm compared to manual digitization and 0.6 cm relative to a pretrained model. Replacing manual digitization with automated detection improves accuracy and facilitates kinematic data collection in large outdoor fields with many athletes and trials. The approach also enables the creation of sport-specific datasets valuable for biomechanical research and training next-generation 3D pose estimation models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.