ReviewSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Survival Models for Predictive Maintenance and Remaining Useful Life in Sensor-Enabled Smart Energy Networks: A Review.
Review in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Smart energy networks, including electricity distribution and district heating, are increasingly operated as sensor-enabled infrastructures where maintenance decisions must be made under heterogeneous and time-varying operating conditions. In these settings, time-to-event data are rarely complete; preventive actions and limited observation horizons routinely introduce censoring and truncation, so models and validation procedures must account for partially observed lifetimes to avoid biased inference and misleading performance estimates. This review surveys survival models for predictive maintenance (PdM) and remaining useful life (RUL) estimation, spanning non-parametric, semi-parametric, parametric, and learning-based approaches, with emphasis on censoring-aware formulations and the use of static and time-varying covariates derived from sensor, inspection, and contextual information. A structured taxonomy and a systematic mapping of model families to data types, core assumptions (proportional hazards versus parametric distributional structure), and decision-oriented outputs such as risk ranking, horizon failure probabilities, and RUL distributions are presented. Evaluation practice is also synthesized by covering discrimination metrics, censoring-aware RUL accuracy measures, and probabilistic assessment via proper scoring rules, including the time-dependent Brier score and Integrated Brier Score (IBS). The review provides researchers and practitioners with a practical guide to selecting, fitting, and evaluating survival models for risk-informed maintenance planning in smart energy networks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.