ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
A Multimodal Biomedical Sensing Approach for Muscle Activation Onset Detection.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Muscle onset detection is a fundamental problem in electromyography signal analysis, human-machine interaction, and rehabilitation assessment. In medical and biomedical applications, slow muscle activation onset processes are widely encountered in scenarios such as rehabilitation training, postural regulation, and fine motor control. Such processes are typically characterized by slowly varying amplitudes, long temporal durations, and high susceptibility to noise interference, which poses significant challenges for accurate identification of onset timing. To address these issues, a lightweight temporal attention method for slow muscle activation onset detection is proposed and systematically validated under multimodal experimental settings. The proposed method takes surface electromyography signals as the primary input, while synchronously acquired optical motion image data are incorporated into the experimental design and result analysis, thereby aligning with the common joint use of optical imaging and physiological signals in medical and biomedical research. From a methodological perspective, the proposed framework is composed of lightweight temporal feature encoding, a slow activation-aware temporal attention mechanism, and noise suppression with stable decision strategies. Under the constraint of low computational complexity, the ability to model progressive activation signals is effectively enhanced. Experiments are conducted on a dataset containing multiple types of slow activation movements, and model performance is evaluated using five-fold cross-validation. The results demonstrate that under regular signal-to-noise ratio conditions, the proposed method significantly outperforms traditional threshold-based approaches, classical machine learning models, and several deep learning baselines in terms of onset detection accuracy, recall, and precision. Specifically, onset detection accuracy reaches approximately 92%, recall is around 90%, and precision is approximately 93%. Meanwhile, the average onset detection error and detection delay are reduced to about 41ms and 28ms, respectively, with the false positive rate controlled at approximately 2.2%. Stable performance is further maintained under different noise levels and cross-subject settings, indicating strong robustness and generalization capability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.