ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
AIM-SEEM: Adapting SEEM for Open-Vocabulary Terrain Segmentation Across Arbitrary Imaging Modalities.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Terrain segmentation performance directly affects the reliability of robotic environmental perception and decision making, yet most existing methods are built upon the assumptions of fixed sensing configurations and closed label sets. As a result, they struggle to meet real world outdoor requirements where modalities can be dynamically available and semantic classes continually expand. This paper systematically studies open-vocabulary terrain segmentation under arbitrary imaging modality combinations and proposes a unified foundation model-based framework named AIM-SEEM (SEEM for Arbitrary Imaging Modalities). Built upon Segment Everything Everywhere All at Once (SEEM), AIM-SEEM performs stable input side adaptation and controlled fusion of heterogeneous modalities, maximizing the reuse of pre-trained visual priors to accommodate different modality types and counts. Furthermore, to address the distribution shifts and the resulting vision-text alignment degradation caused by modality extension, a vision-guided text calibration mechanism is introduced to preserve open-vocabulary segmentation capability under multi-modality combination inputs. Experiments on two benchmarks under three evaluation settings, including full-modality, modality-agnostic, and open-vocabulary, show that AIM-SEEM consistently outperforms prior methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.